Looks Really Do Matter
What do you do before leaving
cast steelfor work in
the morning? Do you change your outfit a few times and check your makeup? We all do. Is it because we realize, on some unconscious level, that people who are more physically attractive have an easier time getting ahead in their careers?In her New York Times Magazine article, “Why Women Can’t Let Sarah Palin Go,” Lisa Belkin claims that the reason educated women
Cast steelresent the former vice-presidential candidate is that they want to believe they
live in a meritocracy. In high school, when smart girls sit at home writing English papers and popping zits, imagining all the pretty, popular girls out at parties, their mothers console them with the thought that when they grew up, they’ll be the
light boxesintelligent, successful ones, whereas those cheerleaders, for all their looks, will never amount to anything.
The government hasn’t expanded discrimination laws to include physical
proximity readercharacteristics because in certain fields, judging someone by her looks is accepted and sometimes even necessary. We expect actors, singers, television anchors, and other figures in the public eye to look their best.Since Richard Nixon’s infamous 1960 television appearance sans makeup arguably lost .
In her article, Belkin writes about how smart, educated women jumped
lost wax castingdown Palin’s throat when she hit the scene. This wasn’t the woman they could get behind, who would help them break the glass ceiling. And it was not so much because of her conservative political beliefs—her pro-life stance, her hawkish invectives against Barack Obama’s “palling around with terrorists”—as because we could so easily dismiss
wow goldher as just a pretty face. (Of course, she didn’t make that too hard for us, you betcha!) No, we wanted someone with a good head on her shoulders, someone with an Ivy League education, someone in a pantsuit.